Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Holdiman, 1:15-cr-00071-DAD-BAM. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160519999 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: May 17, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the status conference hearing in the above-captioned matter now set for May 23, 2016, at 1:00 p.m., before the Honorable Barbara A. McAuliffe, be continued until June 20, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd. The parties have reached an agreement in principal to resolve the case. The parties
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the status conference hearing in the above-captioned matter now set for May 23, 2016, at 1:00 p.m., before the Honorable Barbara A. McAuliffe, be continued until June 20, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd.

The parties have reached an agreement in principal to resolve the case. The parties need additional time to finalize the details of the plea agreement, have it reviewed and signed by client, and filed with the court.

The requested continuance is with the intention of conserving time and resources for both parties and the court. The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation, defense investigation, and plea negotiation purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

ORDER

The status conference hearing in the above-captioned matter now set for May 23, 2016, before the Honorable Barbara A. McAuliffe is VACATED, and the matter is set for Change of Plea on June 20, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd. The delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer