Boggan v. Colvin, 2:16-cv-01820-RFB-VCF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161107597
Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2016
Summary: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner), moves for an extension of time to answer Plaintiff Michael J. Boggan's Complaint For Review Of Final Decision Of The Commissioner by thirty-one days from October 21, 2016 to November 21, 2016, with all other dates extended accordi
Summary: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner), moves for an extension of time to answer Plaintiff Michael J. Boggan's Complaint For Review Of Final Decision Of The Commissioner by thirty-one days from October 21, 2016 to November 21, 2016, with all other dates extended accordin..
More
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner), moves for an extension of time to answer Plaintiff Michael J. Boggan's Complaint For Review Of Final Decision Of The Commissioner by thirty-one days from October 21, 2016 to November 21, 2016, with all other dates extended accordingly. This is the Commissioner's first request for an extension.
There is good cause because the Certified Administrative Record (CAR) has not been produced. The component of the Social Security Administration responsible for production of the CAR, the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) continues to work through a substantial caseload, and has not yet provided the CAR in the above-captioned case. Counsel for the Commissioner has contacted ODAR and is working to produce the CAR. The Commissioner contacted Plaintiff's counsel regarding this motion, but has not yet heard back.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEFENDANT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that I caused Defendant's Motion For Extension Of Time To Answer Plaintiff's Complaint For Review Of Final Decision Of The Commissioner Of Social Security to be served, via CM/ECF notice, on:
CYRUS SAFA
Attorney at Law
cyrus.safa@rohlfinglaw.
Source: Leagle
