Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lily v. Fuechtener, 2:19-cv-00352-RFB-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190712d29 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to Answer (ECF No. 20), filed on June 24, 2019. To date, no response has been filed and the time to do so has now passed. LR 7-2(d) states in pertinent part, that "[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion." Defendant indicates that he is currently incarcerated and is in th
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to Answer (ECF No. 20), filed on June 24, 2019. To date, no response has been filed and the time to do so has now passed. LR 7-2(d) states in pertinent part, that "[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion." Defendant indicates that he is currently incarcerated and is in the process of hiring an attorney to represent him in the instant matter. Defendant requests a 90-day extension to respond to the complaint. The Court finds good cause exists to grant Defendant's request. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to Answer (ECF No. 20) is granted. Defendant shall file a response to the Complaint by no later than Monday, October 1, 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer