Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

AROCHA v. SAUCEDA, 2:11-cv-2959 MCE KJN P. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140918765 Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On May 2, 2014, defendants Hart, Munoz and Rogel filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 111.) On May 9, 2014, defendants Hart, Munoz and Rogel filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 114.) On May 15, 2014, the undersigned granted plaintiff an extension of thirty days to file his opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion. (ECF
More

ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 2, 2014, defendants Hart, Munoz and Rogel filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 111.) On May 9, 2014, defendants Hart, Munoz and Rogel filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 114.)

On May 15, 2014, the undersigned granted plaintiff an extension of thirty days to file his opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion. (ECF No. 115.) On July 10, 2014, the undersigned granted plaintiff's request for a sixty days extension of time to file his oppositions to defendants' motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 119.) Sixty days passed and plaintiff did not file his oppositions to these motions.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days plaintiff shall show cause why plaintiff should not be sanctioned and/or why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to file oppositions to defendants' pending motions.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer