Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Arana v. Berryhill, 2:18-CV-02239-AC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190520642 Visitors: 18
Filed: May 17, 2019
Latest Update: May 17, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF/RESPONSE TO RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS ALLISON CLAIRE , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file a reply brief is extended to June 3, 2019. This is a first extension, taking the due-date from May 16, 2019, to June 3, 2019, because plaintiff's counsel fil
More

STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF/RESPONSE TO RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file a reply brief is extended to June 3, 2019.

This is a first extension, taking the due-date from May 16, 2019, to June 3, 2019, because plaintiff's counsel filed a reply brief yesterday and has several other briefs due in the next two weeks in federal court and with the Appeals Council.

Dated: May 14, 2019. /s/Jesse S. Kaplan JESSE S. KAPLAN Attorney for Plaintiff McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration Dated: May 14, 2019. /s/per e-mail authorization SHARON LAHEY Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of plaintiff's time to file a reply brief is extended to June 3, 2019.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer