Adams v. Berryhill, 2:17-CV-02087-EFB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190110938
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file a reply brief is extended to January 17, 2019. This is a first extension, based on other work plaintiff's counsel must complete. ORDER For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, t
Summary: STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file a reply brief is extended to January 17, 2019. This is a first extension, based on other work plaintiff's counsel must complete. ORDER For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, th..
More
STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file a reply brief is extended to January 17, 2019.
This is a first extension, based on other work plaintiff's counsel must complete.
ORDER
For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is extended to January 17, 2019.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
