Nucci v. Target Corporation, 8:18-cv-00715 DOC (JEMx). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180629c66
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO REMAND [13] DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . Having considered the stipulation between Plaintiff STEPHANIE NUCCI and Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff STEPHANIE NUCCI, as a result of the alleged incident and subsequent claim all described more fully in the Complaint: STEPHANIE NUCCI vs. TARGET CORPORATION, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2018-00979577-CU-PO-CJC, has incurred damages, if an
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO REMAND [13] DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . Having considered the stipulation between Plaintiff STEPHANIE NUCCI and Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff STEPHANIE NUCCI, as a result of the alleged incident and subsequent claim all described more fully in the Complaint: STEPHANIE NUCCI vs. TARGET CORPORATION, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2018-00979577-CU-PO-CJC, has incurred damages, if any..
More
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO REMAND [13]
DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
Having considered the stipulation between Plaintiff STEPHANIE NUCCI and Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, and good cause appearing:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff STEPHANIE NUCCI, as a result of the alleged incident and subsequent claim all described more fully in the Complaint: STEPHANIE NUCCI vs. TARGET CORPORATION, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2018-00979577-CU-PO-CJC, has incurred damages, if any, that do not, and will never be claim to, exceed $75,000. Because Plaintiff's damages do not exceed $75,000, this case does not meet the federal jurisdictional requirements as defined in 28 U.S.C. §1332(a); thus, this case is hereby remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Orange.
Source: Leagle
