GRAY v. U.S., 11-0680-SC. (2011)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20110429c85
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 29, 2011
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ANSWER DATE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. 1. The date by which the Defendant, United States of America ("defendant") is required to answer in the above-captioned matter is April 29, 2011. 2. Defendant has requested, and Plaintiff has granted an extension of time to Defendant to prepare responsive pleadings herein. 3. Plaintiff has sought, and Defendant has provided records from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) which may affect the plaintiff'
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ANSWER DATE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. 1. The date by which the Defendant, United States of America ("defendant") is required to answer in the above-captioned matter is April 29, 2011. 2. Defendant has requested, and Plaintiff has granted an extension of time to Defendant to prepare responsive pleadings herein. 3. Plaintiff has sought, and Defendant has provided records from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) which may affect the plaintiff's..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ANSWER DATE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.
1. The date by which the Defendant, United States of America ("defendant") is required to answer in the above-captioned matter is April 29, 2011.
2. Defendant has requested, and Plaintiff has granted an extension of time to Defendant to prepare responsive pleadings herein.
3. Plaintiff has sought, and Defendant has provided records from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) which may affect the plaintiff's claim.
4. To permit Defendant time to file appropriate responsive pleadings in the above captioned matter, and to permit Plaintiff the opportunity to review the records provided by Defendant, the parties have stipulated to a continuance for Defendant to answer to May 17, 2011.
In accordance with the parties' stipulation,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
