Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WANG v. U.S., C-14-00690-VC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140820i33 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE AND ORDER VINCENT CHHABRIA, District Judge. It is hereby stipulated by and between plaintiffs and defendant United States of America, through their respective counsel, that: 1. A case management conference is currently scheduled in this case on August 26, 2014. The August 26, 2014 case management conference was set after the parties requested a continued conference in order to allow an IRS Revenue Agent to evaluate this case. 2. The IRS Revenue Agent completed a revie
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE AND ORDER

VINCENT CHHABRIA, District Judge.

It is hereby stipulated by and between plaintiffs and defendant United States of America, through their respective counsel, that:

1. A case management conference is currently scheduled in this case on August 26, 2014. The August 26, 2014 case management conference was set after the parties requested a continued conference in order to allow an IRS Revenue Agent to evaluate this case.

2. The IRS Revenue Agent completed a review of this case and one issue requires resolution. In their complaint, Plaintiffs alleged that with regard to 2001 the "IRS failed to apply a payment of $82,880.69 from Ms. Wong's 2001 substituted return to the Plaintiffs' joint account." (Dkt. No. 1 at p. 2 ¶ 11). The IRS transcripts related to the 2001 tax year list an $82,880.69 payment for that year. However, the IRS transcripts show that the payment was removed. For that reason, the government has asked for information related to that $82,880.69 amount from the IRS. Plaintiffs are seeking evidence to clarify what form that payment took and provide it to the defendant.

3. The parties agree that another continuance until September 23, 2014, is appropriate before dates are set in this case. This continuance will permit the parties to exchange information related to the $82,880.69 amount list during the 2001 year, and discuss resolution of the other years in this case. This will narrow the issue in the case so that any discovery, motions and trial is focused on facts in dispute after this final conference.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer