Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Billups v. Berryhill, 3:18-cv-03098-EDL. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181214a69 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Defendant shall have a 21-day extension of time, from December 13, 2018 to January 3, 2019, for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 18). This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant submits that good cau
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Defendant shall have a 21-day extension of time, from December 13, 2018 to January 3, 2019, for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 18).

This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant submits that good cause exists for this extension because the parties have recently engaged in settlement discussions and could not agree on the issue of remedy. Defendant anticipates filing a Motion for Remand, which will significantly reduce the number of issues that this Court will need to resolve and will largely focus on whether this matter should be remanded for further proceedings or an award of benefits. The requested extension will also help accommodate Defendant's counsel's workload, which includes a Ninth Circuit answering brief, numerous other district court cases, and other substantive non-litigation matters within the Office of General Counsel. Defendant's counsel will endeavor to complete the response as soon as possible. This request is made in good faith and with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings, and counsel apologizes for any inconvenience.

Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant's request for an extension of time. The parties further stipulate that the deadline for any reply by Plaintiff will be extended accordingly.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer