Radovska v. Saul, 2:18-cv-2578 JAM CKD. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200207a66
Visitors: 23
Filed: Feb. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2020
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying an application for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") under Title XVI of the Social Security Act ("Act"). On January 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying an application for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") under Title XVI of the Social Security Act ("Act"). On January 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party ..
More
ORDER
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying an application for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") under Title XVI of the Social Security Act ("Act").
On January 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDRED that:
1. The January 13, 2020 findings and recommendations are adopted in full;
2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 13) is granted;
3. The Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 16) is denied; and
4. This matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order.
Source: Leagle
