U.S. v. McFARLIN, 4:12CR00079-01 JLH. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140404d40
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. Court convened on Thursday, April 3, 2014, for a hearing on the government's second superseding motion to revoke the supervised release of defendant Drayton O. McFarlin. Document #37. Assistant United States Attorney Jana K. Harris was present for the government. The defendant appeared in person and with his attorney, Assistant Federal Public Defender Justin T. Eisele. Upon inquiry from the Court, the defendant admitted the allegations outlined in the se
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. Court convened on Thursday, April 3, 2014, for a hearing on the government's second superseding motion to revoke the supervised release of defendant Drayton O. McFarlin. Document #37. Assistant United States Attorney Jana K. Harris was present for the government. The defendant appeared in person and with his attorney, Assistant Federal Public Defender Justin T. Eisele. Upon inquiry from the Court, the defendant admitted the allegations outlined in the sec..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
Court convened on Thursday, April 3, 2014, for a hearing on the government's second superseding motion to revoke the supervised release of defendant Drayton O. McFarlin. Document #37. Assistant United States Attorney Jana K. Harris was present for the government. The defendant appeared in person and with his attorney, Assistant Federal Public Defender Justin T. Eisele.
Upon inquiry from the Court, the defendant admitted the allegations outlined in the second superseding petition to revoke. Following statements from counsel and the defendant, the Court determined that the motion to revoke should be held in abeyance for a period of sixty (60) days to allow defendant the opportunity to demonstrate that he could comply with the conditions of supervision previously imposed by the Court.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the United States Probation Office is directed to provide the Court with a written report reflecting whether or not defendant has been in compliance with the conditions of supervised release previously imposed by Monday, June 2, 2014. In the event the defendant is found to be in violation of his conditions of release prior to June 2, 2014, the United States Attorney is directed to submit the appropriate motion and the Court will conduct a hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
