CURTIS v. STANLY, 5:15CV00206 BSM. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150811641
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , Chief District Judge . The proposed partial findings and recommendations ("PRD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. No objection has been filed. After careful consideration, the PRD are adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1 Plaintiff Ethan Curtis's claims against defendants Briggs and Lum are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. 2 The clerk is directed to terminate Briggs and Lum
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , Chief District Judge . The proposed partial findings and recommendations ("PRD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. No objection has been filed. After careful consideration, the PRD are adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1 Plaintiff Ethan Curtis's claims against defendants Briggs and Lum are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. 2 The clerk is directed to terminate Briggs and Lum a..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, Chief District Judge.
The proposed partial findings and recommendations ("PRD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. No objection has been filed. After careful consideration, the PRD are adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1 Plaintiff Ethan Curtis's claims against defendants Briggs and Lum are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim.
2 The clerk is directed to terminate Briggs and Lum as defendants immediately.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
