California v. BP P.L.C., C 17-06011 WHA (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180326677
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2018
Summary: REQUEST FOR COMMENT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Having reviewed defendants' motions to dismiss, the Court notes that defendant Royal Dutch Shell plc has moved to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(5) for lack of sufficient service of process (Dkt. No. 169). By MARCH 28 AT NOON, all parties shall advise whether it would be best to resolve Royal Dutch Shell's motion challenging service first, and, if it succeeds, whether resolution of all other pending motions should be delayed until any snafu i
Summary: REQUEST FOR COMMENT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Having reviewed defendants' motions to dismiss, the Court notes that defendant Royal Dutch Shell plc has moved to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(5) for lack of sufficient service of process (Dkt. No. 169). By MARCH 28 AT NOON, all parties shall advise whether it would be best to resolve Royal Dutch Shell's motion challenging service first, and, if it succeeds, whether resolution of all other pending motions should be delayed until any snafu in..
More
REQUEST FOR COMMENT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Having reviewed defendants' motions to dismiss, the Court notes that defendant Royal Dutch Shell plc has moved to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(5) for lack of sufficient service of process (Dkt. No. 169). By MARCH 28 AT NOON, all parties shall advise whether it would be best to resolve Royal Dutch Shell's motion challenging service first, and, if it succeeds, whether resolution of all other pending motions should be delayed until any snafu in service is cured.*
In addition, defendants ConocoPhillips Company and Exxon Mobile Corporation set their respective motions to dismiss for hearing on April 26 (Dkt. Nos. 165, 168). As stated in the Court's March 1 order, a hearing date on defendants' motions to dismiss will be set by the Court. The hearings currently set for April 26 are accordingly VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
* All docket numbers herein refer to the docket in Case No. C 17-6011 WHA.
Source: Leagle
