Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Harris, 2:12-cr-0326 MCE KJN P. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181113747 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Movant has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in 2255 proceedings. See, e.g. , Irwin v. United States , 414 F.2d 606 (9th Cir. 1969). However, 18 U.S.C. 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. In the present case, the court does not find that
More

ORDER

Movant has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in § 2255 proceedings. See, e.g., Irwin v. United States, 414 F.2d 606 (9th Cir. 1969). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the request at a later stage of the proceedings.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer