HAYES v. MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., 14-cv-01160-JST. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160503b05
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER VACATING HEARING Re: ECF No. 221 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Partial Class Action Settlement. ECF No. 221. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for May 26, 2016, is hereby VACATED. If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no la
Summary: ORDER VACATING HEARING Re: ECF No. 221 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Partial Class Action Settlement. ECF No. 221. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for May 26, 2016, is hereby VACATED. If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no lat..
More
ORDER VACATING HEARING
Re: ECF No. 221
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Partial Class Action Settlement. ECF No. 221. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for May 26, 2016, is hereby VACATED.
If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the Court's calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
