Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Phillips, 2:15-CR-00081 JAM. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161019922 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING JURY TRIAL, TRIAL CONFIRMATION, AND SETTING MOTION SCHEDULE JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective undersigned counsel that the previously scheduled jury trial, trial confirmation hearing, and motion schedule be continued as follows: Defense motions due January 4, 2017 Government reply due January 30, 2017 Defense closing briefs due February 13, 2017 Motions
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING JURY TRIAL, TRIAL CONFIRMATION, AND SETTING MOTION SCHEDULE

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective undersigned counsel that the previously scheduled jury trial, trial confirmation hearing, and motion schedule be continued as follows:

Defense motions due January 4, 2017

Government reply due January 30, 2017

Defense closing briefs due February 13, 2017

Motions hearing February 28, 2017 at 9:15 a.m.

Trial confirmation hearing continued from January 17, 2017 to March 14, 2017 at 9:15 a.m.

Jury trial continued from February 13, 2017 to April 17, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.

The purpose of this stipulation is to allow Mr. Miller's expert in GPS and cellular data, Mr. Rob Beegle, to conduct an in-depth review of the data and procedures used in this case by law enforcement to conduct the case-related electronic surveillance. The government is in the process of providing additional necessary information concerning the equipment and procedures needed for a constitutionally adequate and necessary analysis. Mr. Beegle estimates that he will need approximately 60 days from the time he receives the balance of this information to complete the examination.

The parties stipulate and agree that the ends of justice will be served by the granting of this request for continuance which outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant's right to a speedy trial and that time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv), corresponding to Local Code T-4, from the previously set for jury trial of date of February 13, 2017, up to and including the proposed date for commencement of trial of April 17, 2017.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court adopt this proposed stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The Court, having read and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety including the exclusion of time for trial pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The previously set dates for all matters referenced in the above Stipulation are hereby vacated and the matters are reset in accordance with the stipulation set forth herein above.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer