Franks v. Kelso, 2:17-cv-1056 KJM CKD P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191212871
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. 1983. On November 18, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to amend. However, plaintiff has not submitted a copy of a proposed amended complaint. As a litigant proceeding in forma pauperis, plaintiff's pleadings are subject to evaluation by this court pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. Because
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. 1983. On November 18, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to amend. However, plaintiff has not submitted a copy of a proposed amended complaint. As a litigant proceeding in forma pauperis, plaintiff's pleadings are subject to evaluation by this court pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. Because ..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. §1983. On November 18, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to amend. However, plaintiff has not submitted a copy of a proposed amended complaint. As a litigant proceeding in forma pauperis, plaintiff's pleadings are subject to evaluation by this court pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended complaint, the court is unable to evaluate it. Furthermore, in his motion, plaintiff fails to indicate specifically how he might amend if granted leave.
For these reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (ECF No. 58) is denied.
Source: Leagle
