Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

QT Management v. American Home Assurance Company, 2:18-cv-00832-APG-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180612b07 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONDENT AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STAY ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS (First Request) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION Plaintiffs QT Management and IDB Group USA Investments (collectively, " Plaintiffs ") and Respondents American Home Assurance Company (" American Home " and together with Plaintiffs the " Parties "), by and through their counsel, r
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONDENT AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STAY ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS (First Request)

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION

Plaintiffs QT Management and IDB Group USA Investments (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Respondents American Home Assurance Company ("American Home" and together with Plaintiffs the "Parties"), by and through their counsel, respectfully submit the following Stipulation to allow American Home until on or before June 22, 2018 to file an opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Stay of Arbitration filed on May 24, 2018. Plaintiffs shall reply to American Home's response within seven days after service of the response.

1. On May 24, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Stay of Arbitration (ECF No. 8) and served a copy thereof on American Home.

2. American Home's deadline to oppose Plaintiffs' Motion for Stay of Arbitration is June 7, 2018.

3. This is the first stipulation for extension of time to file an Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Stay of Arbitration.

4. Good cause for the stipulation exists. The Parties have entered into soordered stipulations providing for reciprocal extensions of time in multiple related actions currently pending in Nevada and New York for similar motions to allow for consistency in their arguments. The Parties respectfully request the extension in this action in order to ensure that the Court receive a full an accurate briefing of the motion before it.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer