SMITH v. STATE, C 10-2959 CRB (PR). (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130529c28
Visitors: 23
Filed: May 21, 2013
Latest Update: May 21, 2013
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Plaintiff again has filed a request asking this court to exercise its discretionary authority to refuse to tax costs in favor of the prevailing party. The request is construed as a motion for reconsideration of the court's December 12, 2012 order denying plaintiff's initial request and is DENIED. See Twentieth Century — Fox Film Corp. v. Dunnahoo, 637 F.2d 1338 , 1341 (9th Cir. 1981). (motions for reconsideration should not be frequently made or free
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Plaintiff again has filed a request asking this court to exercise its discretionary authority to refuse to tax costs in favor of the prevailing party. The request is construed as a motion for reconsideration of the court's December 12, 2012 order denying plaintiff's initial request and is DENIED. See Twentieth Century — Fox Film Corp. v. Dunnahoo, 637 F.2d 1338 , 1341 (9th Cir. 1981). (motions for reconsideration should not be frequently made or freel..
More
ORDER
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff again has filed a request asking this court to exercise its discretionary authority to refuse to tax costs in favor of the prevailing party. The request is construed as a motion for reconsideration of the court's December 12, 2012 order denying plaintiff's initial request and is DENIED. See Twentieth Century — Fox Film Corp. v. Dunnahoo, 637 F.2d 1338, 1341 (9th Cir. 1981). (motions for reconsideration should not be frequently made or freely granted; they are not a substitute for appeal or a means of attacking some perceived error of the court.)
The clerk shell send a copy of this order to the Ninth Circuit.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
