Can v. City and County of San Francisco, 16-cv-05771-JCS. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190625a90
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall ..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge.
The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
