Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lopez v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-01083-SKO. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180620945 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME Doc. 19 SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended until July 16, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defense counsel requires additional time to review the certified administrative record, Plaintiff's Opening Brief, and consider defensibility of
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME Doc. 19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended until July 16, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defense counsel requires additional time to review the certified administrative record, Plaintiff's Opening Brief, and consider defensibility of the Commissioner's final decision. Plaintiff's counsel does not object and agrees that all subsequent deadlines should be accordingly extended.

ORDER

Based on the parties' above-stipulation (Doc. 19), and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant has until July 16, 2018, to submit a response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Scheduling Order (Doc. 6) shall be extended accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer