U.S. v. Canady, 1:17-cr-0262-LJO. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180302879
Visitors: 22
Filed: Feb. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2018
Summary: DEFENDANT MARKEITH CANADY'S REQUEST TO SEAL HIS REPLY TO THE GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO HIS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION AND ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Defendant Markeith Canady respectfully requests that the Court seal his Reply to the Government's Opposition to His Motion to Dismiss for Vindictive Prosecution (ECF 18). The attachment to that reply includes internal e-mail between defendant's counsel, the United States Attorney's office and co-defend
Summary: DEFENDANT MARKEITH CANADY'S REQUEST TO SEAL HIS REPLY TO THE GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO HIS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION AND ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Defendant Markeith Canady respectfully requests that the Court seal his Reply to the Government's Opposition to His Motion to Dismiss for Vindictive Prosecution (ECF 18). The attachment to that reply includes internal e-mail between defendant's counsel, the United States Attorney's office and co-defenda..
More
DEFENDANT MARKEITH CANADY'S REQUEST TO SEAL HIS REPLY TO THE GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO HIS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION AND ORDER
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
Defendant Markeith Canady respectfully requests that the Court seal his Reply to the Government's Opposition to His Motion to Dismiss for Vindictive Prosecution (ECF 18). The attachment to that reply includes internal e-mail between defendant's counsel, the United States Attorney's office and co-defendant counsel. Some e-mail addresses were mistakenly not redacted, and although not specifically listed in local rule 140 as a matter to be redacted, some AUSAs have objected in the past to disclosure of their e-mail address. Therefore, Defendant Markeith Canady requests that his reply containing the e-mail addresses of the AUSA and co-counsel previously filed as ECF 18, be ordered sealed.
ORDER
Good Cause Appearing:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Reply to the Opposition to His Motion to Dismiss for Vindictive Prosecution is sealed, pending further order of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
