Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Lopez-Ramirez, 1:17-cr-00032-NONE-SKO-2. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200221868 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 20, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2020
Summary: ORDER CLARIFYING DEADLINE FOR REPLY RE FIRST STEP ACT MOTION (Doc. No. 68) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On March 11, 2019, defendant Jose Lopez-Ramirez proceeded in pro se to file a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to the First Step Act and 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). (Doc. No. 68.) The matter was referred to the Office of the Federal Public Defender to give that office an opportunity to review the file. (Doc. No. 69.) On April 23, 2019, the Federal Defender's Office formally withd
More

ORDER CLARIFYING DEADLINE FOR REPLY RE FIRST STEP ACT MOTION

(Doc. No. 68)

On March 11, 2019, defendant Jose Lopez-Ramirez proceeded in pro se to file a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to the First Step Act and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). (Doc. No. 68.) The matter was referred to the Office of the Federal Public Defender to give that office an opportunity to review the file. (Doc. No. 69.) On April 23, 2019, the Federal Defender's Office formally withdrew as counsel. (Doc. No. 70.) On June 24, 2019, the government filed an opposition. (Doc. No. 71.) Although the operative scheduling order set a deadline for the filing of a reply that has expired, that order did not clearly indicate that defendant may file a reply in pro se. (See Doc. No. 69.) Accordingly, in an abundance of caution, the court clarifies the schedule to formally permit defendant to file in pro se a reply to his motion. Any such reply must be filed on or before March 27, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer