STIPULATION AND ORDER

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

WHEREAS, defendants' response to the First Amended Complaint in City & County of San Francisco v. Trump, et al., No. 3:17-cv-00485-WHO, is currently due May 5, 2017, pursuant to the Court's Order of May 1, 2017 (Doc. 86);

WHEREAS, defendants' response to the Complaint in County of Santa Clara v. Trump, et al., No. 3:17-cv-00574-WHO, is currently due May 8, 2017, pursuant to the Court's Order of May 1, 2017 (Doc. 101);

WHEREAS, defendants' response to the Complaint in City of Richmond v. Trump, et al., No. No. 3:17-cv-01535-WHO, is currently due May 26, 2017, based on the date of service upon the United States Attorney's office;

WHEREAS, on April 25, 2017, the Court granted motions for preliminary injunction in City & County of San Francisco v. Trump, et al. (Doc. 82) and County of Santa Clara v. Trump, et al. (Doc. 98);

AND WHEREAS, defendants have not filed a motion to stay the Court's Order of April 25, 2017;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows, and respectfully request that the Court so order:

1. Defendants' response to the First Amended Complaint in City & County of San Francisco v. Trump, et al., No. 3:17-cv-00485-WHO, shall be filed no later than June 6, 2017;

2. Defendants' response to the Complaint in County of Santa Clara v. Trump, et al., No. 3:17-cv-00574-WHO, shall be filed no later than June 7, 2017;

3. Defendants' response to the Complaint in City of Richmond v. Trump, et al., No. No. 3:17-cv-01535-WHO, shall be filed no later than June 8, 2017; and

4. If defendants file a motion to stay the Court's Order of April 25, 2017, they shall not argue that the status of the district court proceedings, including that defendants have not yet responded to the complaints, or that a motion to dismiss is pending, is a factor favoring a stay.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.