BIESANZ v. FERGUSON, 10-5017. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120224905
Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge. Now on this 23th day of February, 2012, comes on for consideration the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge (document #35), to which no objections have been made, and the Court, having carefully reviewed said Report And Recommendation, finds that it is sound in all respects, and that it should be adopted in toto. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge is adopted in toto. IT IS FUR
Summary: ORDER JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge. Now on this 23th day of February, 2012, comes on for consideration the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge (document #35), to which no objections have been made, and the Court, having carefully reviewed said Report And Recommendation, finds that it is sound in all respects, and that it should be adopted in toto. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge is adopted in toto. IT IS FURT..
More
ORDER
JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge.
Now on this 23th day of February, 2012, comes on for consideration the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge (document #35), to which no objections have been made, and the Court, having carefully reviewed said Report And Recommendation, finds that it is sound in all respects, and that it should be adopted in toto.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge is adopted in toto.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendants Petray and Bisbee are dismissed on motion of plaintiff.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge, plaintiff's claims against all remaining defendants are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
