LEWIS v. STATE, 2:11-1444-GEB-KJN-P. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120323893
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge. Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 7, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and rec
Summary: ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge. Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 7, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and reco..
More
ORDER
GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 7, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 7, 2012, are adopted in full;
2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied; and
3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.
Source: Leagle
