WILLIAMS v. HOBBS, 5:13-cv-209-DPM-JTR. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20141216a00
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER D. P. MARSHALL, District Judge. After de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Ray's recommendation. N o 18; FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Williams's objections, N o 19, are overruled. His claims are procedurally defaulted. The Court declines to stay the case while Williams returns to state court because no avenue exists for him to get relief there now on these claims. And no basis exists for a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1)-(2). So Ordered.
ORDER
D. P. MARSHALL, District Judge.
After de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Ray's recommendation. No 18; FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Williams's objections, No 19, are overruled. His claims are procedurally defaulted. The Court declines to stay the case while Williams returns to state court because no avenue exists for him to get relief there now on these claims. And no basis exists for a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2).
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
