PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. ADOBE SYSTEMS, 8:10CV220. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20120327c64
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the "emergency motion" of plaintiff Prism Technologies, Inc. ("Prism") "to preserve evidence and for sanctions" as to defendant Adobe Systems Incorporated ("Adobe") (Filing No. 528 ). Prism filed an accompanying brief with indices of evidence (Filing Nos. 529-531 ). One day later, Adobe filed an "objection to expedited review of Prism's `emergency' motion" (Filing No. 533 ), with accompanying index of evidence (F
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the "emergency motion" of plaintiff Prism Technologies, Inc. ("Prism") "to preserve evidence and for sanctions" as to defendant Adobe Systems Incorporated ("Adobe") (Filing No. 528 ). Prism filed an accompanying brief with indices of evidence (Filing Nos. 529-531 ). One day later, Adobe filed an "objection to expedited review of Prism's `emergency' motion" (Filing No. 533 ), with accompanying index of evidence (Fi..
More
ORDER
LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the "emergency motion" of plaintiff Prism Technologies, Inc. ("Prism") "to preserve evidence and for sanctions" as to defendant Adobe Systems Incorporated ("Adobe") (Filing No. 528). Prism filed an accompanying brief with indices of evidence (Filing Nos. 529-531). One day later, Adobe filed an "objection to expedited review of Prism's `emergency' motion" (Filing No. 533), with accompanying index of evidence (Filing No. 534). After reviewing the parties' submissions, the Court finds that Prism's motion cannot be adequately addressed without a full briefing of the issues raised therein. The Court will not issue an order in any "emergency" manner, but will wait until the issues are ripe for decision. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Adobe shall file a brief opposing Prism's motion on or before April 9, 2012, and
2) Prism shall file a reply brief on or before April 16, 2012.
Source: Leagle
