Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Shank v. Berryhill, 1:16-cv-00423-GSA. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170301924 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER RESPONSIVE BRIEF GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have an extension to March 24 to file her responsive brief or stipulated remand. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time to consult with the client for the possibility of voluntary remand, and because the undersigned
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER RESPONSIVE BRIEF

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have an extension to March 24 to file her responsive brief or stipulated remand. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time to consult with the client for the possibility of voluntary remand, and because the undersigned has an upcoming family vacation to Taiwan that will result in an absence from the office from Monday, February 27 through Friday, March 17, 2017.

Stip. to Extend Def.'s Brief

The new due date for Defendant's responsive brief or remand stipulation will be Friday, March 24, 2017.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation (Doc. 18), the Defendant's Opposition shall be filed no later than March 24, 2017. Plaintiff shall file any Reply no later than fifteen (15) days after the filing of the Opposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer