Weghorst Shaw v. Colvin, 1:15-cv-01409-SKO. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160914b00
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 21) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, to extend the time for Defendant to file her Answering Brief to October 12, 2016. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time to file her Answering Brief. Defense counsel requires additional time to further consider the government's position due to time spent on a case of first impression bef
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 21) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, to extend the time for Defendant to file her Answering Brief to October 12, 2016. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time to file her Answering Brief. Defense counsel requires additional time to further consider the government's position due to time spent on a case of first impression befo..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
(Doc. 21)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, to extend the time for Defendant to file her Answering Brief to October 12, 2016. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time to file her Answering Brief. Defense counsel requires additional time to further consider the government's position due to time spent on a case of first impression before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals requiring input from other agency components, unexpected proceedings in an EEOC case that have required immediate action by numerous agency components, several EEOC depositions that must be completed before the end of the fiscal year, and administrative tasks that must be completed before the end of the fiscal year. Plaintiff's counsel does not object and agrees that all subsequent deadlines should be accordingly extended.
ORDER
Based on the above stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The parties' stipulated request for an extension of time for Defendant to file her responsive brief is GRANTED;
2. Defendant's responsive brief shall be filed on or before October 12, 2016; and
3. Plaintiff may file an optional reply brief on or before October 31, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
