Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Graham-Sult v. Clainos, 4:10-cv-04877-CW. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140513g64 Visitors: 17
Filed: May 12, 2014
Latest Update: May 12, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING NEW CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs ALEXANDER GRAHAM-SULT, an individual, and DAVID GRAHAM, an individual ("plaintiffs"), and defendants NICHOLAS P. CLAINOS, an individual, BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES LLC, d/b/a WOLFGANG'S VAULT, a limited liability company, NORTON LLC, a limited liability company, and WILLIAM E SAGAN, an individual ("defendants") by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as foll
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING NEW CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE

CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs ALEXANDER GRAHAM-SULT, an individual, and DAVID GRAHAM, an individual ("plaintiffs"), and defendants NICHOLAS P. CLAINOS, an individual, BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES LLC, d/b/a WOLFGANG'S VAULT, a limited liability company, NORTON LLC, a limited liability company, and WILLIAM E SAGAN, an individual ("defendants") by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows.

A. WHEREAS, on April 28, 2014, the Clerk of this Court gave notice that a Case Management Conference had been scheduled for May 21, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.

B. WHEREAS, counsel for plaintiff, Therese Y. Cannata, is unavailable on May 21, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. to appear at the Case Management Conference due to a previous commitment. See Cannata Decl., filed concurrently, at ¶2.

C. WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred about re-scheduling the Case Management Conference.

Now, therefore, it is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and among the parties hereto through their undersigned attorneys of record, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

The parties hereby agree to continue the Case Management Conference from May 21, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. to June 4, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. Correspondingly, the parties agree to move the deadline for the Case Management Statement from May 14, 2014 to May 28, 2014.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DECLARATION OF THERESE Y. CANNATA IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR A NEW CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE

I, THERESE Y. CANNATA, hereby declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney at law, duly licensed to practice before all Courts of the State of California, and am in good standing with the State Bar of California. I am a member of the law firm of Cannata, Ching & O'Toole, LLP, attorneys of record for plaintiffs Alexander Graham-Sult and David Graham. I make this declaration based upon my personal knowledge, except where indicated upon information and belief. If called upon to testify as to the truth of the matters set forth herein, I could and would do so based upon my own personal knowledge, and as to those matters stated upon information and belief, I believe them to be true.

2. On May 21, 2014, I have an all-day teaching obligation for the National Institute of Trial Advocacy located at the Sierra Club in San Francisco, California. This teaching obligation was scheduled before this Court provided its April 28, 2014 notice of the May 21, 2014 Case Management Conference.

3. On May 6, 2014, my assistant, Mr. Lindarto, contacted the Clerk of this Court, Ms. Riley, in order to obtain possible new dates for the Case Management Conference. I an informed and believe the Ms. Riley stated that Judge Wilken generally handles Case Management Conferences every Wednesday at 2:00 p.m., but that Mr. Lindarto should check the Court's schedule to ensure that the Court is available on the new date. I am informed and believe that Mr. Lindarto checked the Court's calendar and determined that the Court and my office were both available on Wednesday, June 4, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. As such, this is the date we proposed to all counsel for the new Case Management Conference.

4. Since returning to the trial court from the Ninth Circuit, there have been no previous time modifications in this case, whether by stipulation or Court order.

5. I do not anticipate that this requested time modification will have any effect on the schedule for this case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer