Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kim v. Palisades Restaurant Group Inc., 2:19-cv-06112-DSF-AS. (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20191104946 Visitors: 24
Filed: Oct. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2019
Summary: Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a plaintiff to serve process on the defendants within 90 days of the filing of the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The Court may extend this deadline for good cause. Id. More than 90 days have passed since the complaint in this case was filed, and Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service for at least one defendant. Therefore, Plaintiff is ordered to sho
More

Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a plaintiff to serve process on the defendants within 90 days of the filing of the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The Court may extend this deadline for good cause. Id. More than 90 days have passed since the complaint in this case was filed, and Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service for at least one defendant. Therefore, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause no later than November 15, 2019 why the unserved defendant(s) should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of proof(s) of service showing that the relevant defendant(s) was/were served within the 90-day period or a showing of good cause for extending the service period constitute adequate responses to this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer