Filed: Apr. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. 1983 claims are DISMISSED w
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. 1983 claims are DISMISSED wi..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that
1. Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 85) is DENIED as MOOT.
3. Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
4. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.
5. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this Recommendation and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
