Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JOHNSON v. SINGH, 2:15-cv-0173 CKD. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160516666 Visitors: 31
Filed: May 13, 2016
Latest Update: May 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff's motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on May 11, 2016. Amanda Lockhart appeared telephonically for plaintiff. No appearance was made for defendants. Upon review of the documents in support, no opposition having been filed, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The motion to compel (ECF No. 21) is granted. No later than May 18, 2016, defendant Sing
More

ORDER

Plaintiff's motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on May 11, 2016. Amanda Lockhart appeared telephonically for plaintiff. No appearance was made for defendants. Upon review of the documents in support, no opposition having been filed, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The motion to compel (ECF No. 21) is granted. No later than May 18, 2016, defendant Singh shall, without objection, provide responses to the interrogatories and produce responsive documents. Defendant is cautioned that failure to comply with this order may result in striking of defendant's answer and entry of default judgment against defendant.

2. Reasonable expenses of $600 incurred in connection with the motion are awarded to plaintiff against defendant.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer