LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
The United States of America filed a petition to enforce an internal revenue summons issued July 22, 2016, as part of an investigation of Respondent Jose Alejandro Hernandez to secure books and records relating to the tax liability or the collection of the tax liability for federal income tax for the years ending December 31, 2013, December 31, 2014, and December 31, 2015. ECF 1. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 302 and 304.
The Magistrate Judge ordered Respondent to appear and show cause on February 24, 2017, why the I.R.S. summons issued to him on July 22, 2016, should not be enforced. ECF 4. The Petitioner served Respondent with the verified petition filed November 17, 2016 (ECF 1), and its supporting memorandum (ECF 3-1), and the Order to Show Cause filed November 21, 2016 (ECF 4), in conformity with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Respondent did not file opposition or non-opposition to the verified petition as provided for in the Order to Show Cause.
At the show cause hearing, Bobbie J. Montoya, Assistant United States Attorney, appeared on behalf of Petitioner, and investigating Revenue Agent Naoemi Salinas also was present in the courtroom. Respondent Jose Alejandro Hernandez personally appeared at the hearing. On March 13, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations finding that the summons enforcement requirements had been satisfied and recommending the summons be enforced and that Respondent be ordered to appear at the I.R.S. offices at 2525 Capitol Street, Suite 203, Fresno, California, before Revenue Agent Salinas or her designated representative, on April 28, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., as agreed to by Revenue Agent Naoemi Salinas and Respondent Jose Alejandro Hernandez at the show cause hearing. ECF 8. The Clerk of Court served Respondent by mail with the Findings and Recommendations on March 13, 2017.
The Findings and Recommendations provided 14 days for the filing of objections. No objections have been filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis and determines that summons enforcement is properly granted.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
IT IS SO ORDERED.