Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Ramson, 2:16-CR-00113-GEB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161007859 Visitors: 25
Filed: Oct. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 05, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND EXCLUDE TIME PERIOD UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , Senior District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, Assistant United States Attorney, James R. Conolly, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, Assistant Federal Defender, Douglas Beevers, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for an
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND EXCLUDE TIME PERIOD UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, Assistant United States Attorney, James R. Conolly, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, Assistant Federal Defender, Douglas Beevers, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for an evidentiary hearing on October 7, 2016.

2. By this stipulation, and for the reasons set forth below, the parties request that the Court continue the evidentiary hearing until November 4, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. and to exclude time between October 7, 2016, and November 4, 2016, under Local Code T4.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a) The parties have been diligent in gathering evidence and preparing its presentation at the evidentiary hearing. b) The parties' efforts to uncover evidence has resulted in new information, which speaks to the issues that will be examined at the evidentiary hearing. The parties are in the process of producing new information to each other. The defense needs time to review this discovery, and the parties agree that additional time is required to prepare for the hearing. c) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. d) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of October 7, 2016 to November 4, 2016, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

FINDINGS AND ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer