Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HASSAN v. COLVIN, 2:13-CV-02019-CKD. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150219870 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1920 CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, that Plaintiff's previously filed Notice of Motion and Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act is hereby withdrawn. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, that Plaintiff's previously filed Notice of Motion and Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act is hereby withdrawn.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the Court's approval, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the amount of THREE THOUSAND, SIX-HUNDRED DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($3,600.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of ZERO DOLLARS ($0.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does notowe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Jesse S. Kaplan pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of THREE THOUSAND, SIX-HUNDRED DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($3,600.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of ZERO DOLLARS ($0.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer