CANOPIUS US INSURANCE, INC. v. JOHNSON, 4:13-CV-4079. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160325d62
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Motion to Dismiss as Untimely. (ECF No. 82). No response to the motion has been filed, and the time to do so has passed. The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. Plaintiff moves to strike Defendant-Claimants' Motion to Dismiss which was filed on October 6, 2015. (ECF No. 78). The Court previously ordered that all dispositive motions in this case be re-filed on or before September 18, 2015.
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Motion to Dismiss as Untimely. (ECF No. 82). No response to the motion has been filed, and the time to do so has passed. The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. Plaintiff moves to strike Defendant-Claimants' Motion to Dismiss which was filed on October 6, 2015. (ECF No. 78). The Court previously ordered that all dispositive motions in this case be re-filed on or before September 18, 2015. ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Motion to Dismiss as Untimely. (ECF No. 82). No response to the motion has been filed, and the time to do so has passed. The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration.
Plaintiff moves to strike Defendant-Claimants' Motion to Dismiss which was filed on October 6, 2015. (ECF No. 78). The Court previously ordered that all dispositive motions in this case be re-filed on or before September 18, 2015. (ECF No. 69). Defendant-Claimants have not attempted to show good cause for failing to comply with the Court's deadline. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 82) should be and hereby is GRANTED. Defendant-Claimants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 78) is hereby struck from the record.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Court notes that the arguments made in Defendant-Claimants' Motion to Dismiss were also raised in their response to Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. Accordingly, the majority of the issues raised in the Motion to Dismiss will be addressed in the Court's forthcoming order on the summary judgment motion.
Source: Leagle
