Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. $42,906.72 seized from Wells Fargo, 2:17-MC-00157-TLN-KJN. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190718830 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimants Gregorio Ramirez Castillo and Jennifer Jannette Castillo-Ramirez ("claimants"), by and through their respective counsel, as follows: 1. On or about July 24, 2017, claimants filed claims in the administrative forfeiture proceedings with the Drug Enforce
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE

It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimants Gregorio Ramirez Castillo and Jennifer Jannette Castillo-Ramirez ("claimants"), by and through their respective counsel, as follows:

1. On or about July 24, 2017, claimants filed claims in the administrative forfeiture proceedings with the Drug Enforcement Administration with respect to the $42,906.72 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2249869062 (hereafter "defendant currency"), which was seized on May 8, 2017.

2. The Drug Enforcement Administration has sent the written notice of intent to forfeit required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time has expired for any person to file a claim to the defendant currency under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person other than the claimants have filed a claim to the defendant currency as required by law in the administrative forfeiture proceeding.

3. Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of the parties. That deadline was October 20, 2017.

4. By Stipulation and Order filed October 23, 2017, the parties stipulated to extend to December 19, 2017, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

5. By Stipulation and Order filed January 2, 2018, the parties stipulated to extend to January 19, 2017, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

6. By Stipulation and Order filed January 19, 2018, the parties stipulated to extend to February 19, 2017, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

7. By Stipulation and Order filed February 15, 2018, the parties stipulated to extend to May 21, 2018, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

8. By Stipulation and Order filed May 18, 2018, the parties stipulated to extend to August 20, 2018, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

9. By Stipulation and Order filed August 13, 2018, the parties stipulated to extend to November 19, 2018, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

10. By Stipulation and Order filed October 24, 2018, the parties stipulated to extend to January 18, 2019, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

11. By Stipulation and Order filed January 18, 2019, the parties stipulated to extend to March 19, 2019, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

12. By Stipulation and Order filed March 20, 2019, the parties stipulated to extend to May 20, 2019, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

13. By Stipulation and Order filed May 21, 2019, the parties stipulated to extend to July 19, 2019, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

14. As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement to further extend to September 17, 2019, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

15. Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to September 17, 2019.

McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney /s/Kevin C. Khasigian KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney Dated: 7/16/2019 /s/Yan Shrayberman YAN SHRAYBERMAN Attorney for claimants Gregorian Ramirez Castillo and Jennifer Jannette Castillo-Ramirez (Authorized via email)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer