Jefferson v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-1694-JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180427c91
Visitors: 35
Filed: Apr. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 9) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties have stipulated for Defendant to have an extension of thirty days to file and serve a certified copy of the administrative record. (Doc. 9) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5-1 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The request for an extension of time (Doc. 9
Summary: ORDER GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 9) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties have stipulated for Defendant to have an extension of thirty days to file and serve a certified copy of the administrative record. (Doc. 9) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5-1 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The request for an extension of time (Doc. 9)..
More
ORDER GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME
(Doc. 9)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
The parties have stipulated for Defendant to have an extension of thirty days to file and serve a certified copy of the administrative record. (Doc. 9) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5-1 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
1. The request for an extension of time (Doc. 9) is GRANTED; and
2. Defendant SHALL file the certified administrative record on or before June 7, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
