Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Carpenter v. Davis, 98-cv-02444-MMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180608b10 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING FOR GROUP 5 CLAIMS Re: Dkt. No. 252 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . The Court having read and considered the parties' "Consolidated Statement Re Group 5 Scheduling," petitioner's request to postpone briefing for the Group 5 claims in the above-titled case until after the parties have briefed the Group 5 claims in related Case No. 00-cv-3706 is hereby DENIED. Petitioner has not shown such postponement is necessary or that it would benefit the Court's analysi
More

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING FOR GROUP 5 CLAIMS

Re: Dkt. No. 252

The Court having read and considered the parties' "Consolidated Statement Re Group 5 Scheduling," petitioner's request to postpone briefing for the Group 5 claims in the above-titled case until after the parties have briefed the Group 5 claims in related Case No. 00-cv-3706 is hereby DENIED. Petitioner has not shown such postponement is necessary or that it would benefit the Court's analysis of the claims in the above-titled case, as each case involves a different jury and distinct instances of alleged juror misconduct.

The Court hereby adopts the parties' proposed briefing schedule (see Consolidated Statement, filed May 25, 2018 at 4):

1. Respondent shall file his opening brief within 120 days of the date of this Order;

2. Petitioner shall file his response within 90 days after the opening brief is filed;

3. Respondent shall file any reply brief within 30 days after Petitioner's response is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer