BARNES v. HOBBS, 5:13CV00062 BSM. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20141203769
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 2] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by Robert Barnes is dismissed without prejudice. In
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 2] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by Robert Barnes is dismissed without prejudice. In ..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 2] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by Robert Barnes is dismissed without prejudice. In § 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if a petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). As there is no issue on which Barnes has made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
