USA v. Liu, 12-cr-00611-PJH-1. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171130d96
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 29, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING STIPULATION RE PAYMENT OF CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES INTO COURT REGISTRY BEFORE SENTENCING Re: Dkt. No. 36 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . Defendant Danli Liu's stipulated request to deposit funds in the court registry in advance of sentencing for payment of restitution and the special assessment is DENIED for failure to show good cause for the court to hold these funds pending sentencing, and then issue a separate order to apply those funds to defendant's payment obl
Summary: ORDER DENYING STIPULATION RE PAYMENT OF CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES INTO COURT REGISTRY BEFORE SENTENCING Re: Dkt. No. 36 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . Defendant Danli Liu's stipulated request to deposit funds in the court registry in advance of sentencing for payment of restitution and the special assessment is DENIED for failure to show good cause for the court to hold these funds pending sentencing, and then issue a separate order to apply those funds to defendant's payment obli..
More
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION RE PAYMENT OF CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES INTO COURT REGISTRY BEFORE SENTENCING
Re: Dkt. No. 36
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
Defendant Danli Liu's stipulated request to deposit funds in the court registry in advance of sentencing for payment of restitution and the special assessment is DENIED for failure to show good cause for the court to hold these funds pending sentencing, and then issue a separate order to apply those funds to defendant's payment obligations. This proposed procedure imposes an unnecessary burden on the court. Absent good cause, the court prefers that defendant be prepared to deposit those funds on the day of sentencing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
