Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Haynes v. Johnson, 2:15-CV-00565-WBS-DB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170105738 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL, PRE-TRIAL, LAW AND MOTION AND DISCOVERY DATES WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . STIPULATION WHEREAS the parties, by and through their respective counsel have met and conferred and agreed; WHEREAS discovery and dispositive motions were substantially delayed in order to permit sufficient time for Plaintiffs' counsel to file a motion to withdraw, for the Court to rule on the matter and for Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs' counsel to recon
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL, PRE-TRIAL, LAW AND MOTION AND DISCOVERY DATES

STIPULATION

WHEREAS the parties, by and through their respective counsel have met and conferred and agreed;

WHEREAS discovery and dispositive motions were substantially delayed in order to permit sufficient time for Plaintiffs' counsel to file a motion to withdraw, for the Court to rule on the matter and for Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs' counsel to reconcile and be able to move forward with the case;

WHEREAS two litigation attorneys, including former counsel of record Ted Wood, have departed from the City of Stockton City Attorney's Office;

WHEREAS effective December 30, 2016, new counsel from Cota Cole LLP have associated into the case for Defendants;

WHEREAS due to the holiday period, obtaining fully executed substitutions of attorney from each individual defendant have been temporarily delayed;

WHEREAS Cota Cole LLP will be fully substituting into the case for the City Attorney as soon as the appropriate substitution documents are prepared and filed with the Court;

WHEREAS new counsel needs sufficient time to review and analyze the case, the current state of discovery, which is incomplete and prepare the case for the completion of discovery, potential dispositive motions and trial;

WHEREAS Plaintiffs have also not yet completed discovery; WHEREAS Plaintiffs' counsel is set for two trials in February 2017;

WHEREAS pre-trial and trial will need to be continued to accommodate continuing discovery and dispositive motions;

WHEREAS pending the Court's approval, the parties have agreed to continue all dates approximately 4-6 months depending upon the Court's schedule and ability to accommodate as follows:

Current New Rebuttal Expert Disclosures 01/06/17 04/24/17 Fact Discovery Deadline 01/24/17 05/29/17 Expert Discovery Deadline 02/28/17 06/06/17 Discovery Motion Hearing Deadline N/A 07/18/17 Dispositive Motion Hearing Deadline N/A 08/21/17 Mandatory Settlement Conference N/A 09/26/17 Pre-Trial Conference 07/03/17 10/16/17 Trial 09/16/17 01/30/17

SO STIPULATED

Stipulation & [Proposed] Order to Continue Trial, Pre-Trial, Law and Motion & Discovery Dates Case No. 2:15-CV-00565-WBS-DB

ORDER

The Court having considered the above stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, hereby orders the following dates and deadlines be reset and continued as follows:

Current New Rebuttal Expert Disclosures 01/06/17 03/03/17 Fact Discovery Deadline 01/24/17 03/21/17 Expert Discovery Deadline 02/28/17 04/28/17 Discovery Motion Filing Deadline N/A 05/25/17 Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline N/A 06/23/17 Pre-Trial Conference 07/03/17 09/11/17 at 1:30 p.m. Trial 09/6/17 11/28/17 at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer