Sartiaguda v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02280-CMK. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180606a27
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 45 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 45 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The current due date is June 4, 2018. The new due date will be July 19, 2018. This is Defendant's first requ
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 45 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 45 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The current due date is June 4, 2018. The new due date will be July 19, 2018. This is Defendant's first reque..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 45 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 45 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The current due date is June 4, 2018. The new due date will be July 19, 2018.
This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time in this case. There is good cause for this request. During the weekend of April 1, 2018, Defendant's counsel had a serious personal emergency and took multiple days of leave to address and recover from the emergency and continues to take leave intermittently for treatment. Defendant's counsel is continuing to address and prioritize the backlog of cases that she could not address while on leave, while also balancing her full workload of district court cases and employment law matters.
Thus, Defendant is respectfully requesting additional time up to and including July 19, 2018, to fully review the record and research the issues presented by Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in this case. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
