Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ALEXANDER v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, CV 13-3296 WHO. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131227e23 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DATE OF INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2(d) of the Northern District of California, Plaintiff Stephanie Alexander ("Plaintiff"), Defendant Pacific Maritime Association ("PMA"), Defendant International Longshore and Warehouse Union ("ILWU") and Defendant ILWU Local 10 (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, file this stipulation to continue
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DATE OF INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2(d) of the Northern District of California, Plaintiff Stephanie Alexander ("Plaintiff"), Defendant Pacific Maritime Association ("PMA"), Defendant International Longshore and Warehouse Union ("ILWU") and Defendant ILWU Local 10 (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, file this stipulation to continue the Initial Case Management Conference currently set for October 15, 2013; at 2:00 p.m.

WHEREAS, on August 27, 2013, this Court set an Initial Case Management Conference for October 15, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.;

WHEREAS, the Court's August 27, 2013 Case Management Conference Order and N.D. Local Rule 16-10(a) require lead trial counsel for each party to attend the Initial Case Management Conference;

WHEREAS, Robert Jon Hendricks is lead trial counsel for PMA in this matter;

WHEREAS, Mr. Hendricks is lead trial counsel in another matter in which a two-week jury trial is scheduled to begin on or around October 1, 2013;

WHEREAS, Mr. Hendricks is unable to attend the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter because of this directly conflicting trial date;

WHEREAS, N.D. Local Rule 16-2 permits the Parties to seek relief from the Court's case management schedule by stipulating to change the date of any case management conference;

WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties have engaged in the Rule 26(f) early meeting of counsel; and

WHEREAS, during the Rule 26(f) early meeting of counsel the Parties conferred regarding a proposed new date for the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter and Plaintiff, ILWU, and ILWU Local 10 do not oppose a continuance of the Initial Case Management Conference.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer