Robbins v. Phillips 66 Company, 18-cv-00292-RS (TSH). (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191008n99
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2019
Summary: DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 87 THOMAS S. HIXSON , Magistrate Judge . On November 9, 2018, Judge Seeborg referred a discovery dispute "and any further discovery disputes" to the undersigned. ECF No. 36. Despite this, today non-party Irwin Industries, Inc., filed a motion to quash a subpoena, noticed for a hearing before Judge Seeborg. ECF No. 87. The motion also violates the undersigned's Discovery Standing Order, which requires counsel to speak to each other before filing a discovery moti
Summary: DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 87 THOMAS S. HIXSON , Magistrate Judge . On November 9, 2018, Judge Seeborg referred a discovery dispute "and any further discovery disputes" to the undersigned. ECF No. 36. Despite this, today non-party Irwin Industries, Inc., filed a motion to quash a subpoena, noticed for a hearing before Judge Seeborg. ECF No. 87. The motion also violates the undersigned's Discovery Standing Order, which requires counsel to speak to each other before filing a discovery motio..
More
DISCOVERY ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 87
THOMAS S. HIXSON, Magistrate Judge.
On November 9, 2018, Judge Seeborg referred a discovery dispute "and any further discovery disputes" to the undersigned. ECF No. 36. Despite this, today non-party Irwin Industries, Inc., filed a motion to quash a subpoena, noticed for a hearing before Judge Seeborg. ECF No. 87. The motion also violates the undersigned's Discovery Standing Order, which requires counsel to speak to each other before filing a discovery motion, and which requires discovery disputes to be raised in a joint letter brief of not more than five pages. Irwin Industries' motion to quash is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
