WILLIAMS v. POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS, 14-594-CG-M. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150709983
Visitors: 32
Filed: Jul. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendant Poarch Band of Creek Indians' Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED and Plaintiff Christine J. Williams' Com
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendant Poarch Band of Creek Indians' Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED and Plaintiff Christine J. Williams' Comp..
More
ORDER
CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that Defendant Poarch Band of Creek Indians' Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED and Plaintiff Christine J. Williams' Complaint is DISMISSED.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle