Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Turner v. Van Buren Police Department, 2:19-CV-02142. (2020)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20200108615 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2020
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III , District Judge . Separate Defendants City of Van Buren, Charles Green, Jamie Hammond, David Passen, Van Buren Municipal Complex, and Van Buren Police Department have filed a motion (Doc. 10) to stay this 1983 action pending criminal disposition of Plaintiff Candace-Renee Turner's case. Plaintiff has filed a response (Doc. 13) in opposition. Defendants argue that the Younger abstention doctrine requires that this case be administratively stayed pending resolutio
More

ORDER

Separate Defendants City of Van Buren, Charles Green, Jamie Hammond, David Passen, Van Buren Municipal Complex, and Van Buren Police Department have filed a motion (Doc. 10) to stay this § 1983 action pending criminal disposition of Plaintiff Candace-Renee Turner's case. Plaintiff has filed a response (Doc. 13) in opposition. Defendants argue that the Younger abstention doctrine requires that this case be administratively stayed pending resolution of Plaintiff's state court criminal proceedings, which arise out of the same transaction or occurrence that gives rise to her civil action in this court. Plaintiff argues that allowing state court criminal proceedings to continue will result in a continuation of the constitutional violations she alleges in her complaint.

"Younger1 directs federal courts to abstain from hearing cases when (1) there is an ongoing state judicial proceeding which (2) implicates important state interests, and when (3) that proceeding affords an adequate opportunity to raise the federal questions presented." Fuller v. Ulland, 76 F.3d 957, 959 (8th Cir. 1996). There is an ongoing state criminal proceeding here, and there is no question that Arkansas has an interest in determining whether or not one of its state citizens is guilty of violating its state laws. Furthermore, many of the federal constitutional issues raised in this case also may be raised in defense of that case, whether through a motion to suppress or some other vehicle. Younger abstention "precludes any presumption that the state courts will not safeguard federal constitutional rights." Middlesex Cty. Ethics Comm. v. Garden State Bar Ass'n, 457 U.S. 423, 731 (1982) (emphasis omitted).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Separate Defendants' motion to stay (Doc. 10) is GRANTED. This case is STAYED, and the Clerk is directed to administratively close the matter pending further order. Separate Defendant City of Van Buren is directed to move to reopen this matter following final resolution of the state court case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Separate Defendants Crawford County Detention Center and Halbert Torraca's motion to dismiss (Doc. 3) is TERMINATED, with leave to refile upon reopening of this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer